Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 01:37
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
As a teacher, what's the most inappropriate experience you've had with a student?
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
This Chinese Spacecraft Is Traveling to One of Earth’s Quasi-Moons - WIRED
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What are some cool examples of two kinds of people?
What’s next?
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
All the ways Apple TV boxes do—and mostly don’t—track you - Ars Technica
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Robinhood Traders Playing S&P Index-Guessing Game Get Schooled - Bloomberg
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Orioles Designate Emmanuel Rivera For Assignment, Option Heston Kjerstad - MLB Trade Rumors
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.